I had no problems with the article, in fact it was quite a good read, but this one statement stood out to me as unfounded:

He is in step with the authoritarian movements growing in many parts of the world right now, providing intellectual support for them.

Peterson promotes ‘extreme’ individuality and champions freedom of speech above anything else. He condemns group ideologies and warns of their dangers, that’s why whole anti-postmodernism idea. Linking him with authoritarian movements would be illogical. Even more so if they’re far-right groups, which he shares no commonalities with — or ever has defended.

Other than that, I think you gave a good overview on the Jordan Peterson phenomenon. I agree with you to an extent when it comes to IQ and there still being inequality, these are great points. I don’t agree with the conclusion of the article though. You’re misinterpreting Peterson a lot there.